Decision Ownership Stabilisation™ helps leadership identify potential decision gaps through screening and, where warranted, independently investigate what changed after approval — before further capital is committed.
Start Decision Screening →We determine. Leadership decides.
The problem begins when leadership is asked to commit further and cannot clearly evidence how the programme moved from the decision originally approved to the position now being executed.
Cost, scope, delivery route and conditions, on the record.
Each material change traced to a named approval.
Documents the board can see, not recollection.
Between approval and execution, three things can move without
anyone formally deciding they should.
We establish who owned it at each stage, and whether they had the authority.
We examine whether the original approval conditions and assumptions still govern execution.
These changes accurately describe Phase 2 evidence investigation without suggesting that every event can necessarily be traced to a record.
A structured questionnaire tests whether potential issues or uncertainties concerning an approved decision warrant further investigation.
A full reconstruction of what changed, when it changed and what authority supported it.
Follows Phase 1, where an investigation is warranted.
Working alongside CEOs, Managing Directors and change leaders across multiple sectors, Nadia repeatedly saw approved decisions return for reconsideration after execution was underway.
These experiences shaped Decision Ownership Stabilisation™ — an evidence-based method developed to establish what changed, when it changed and what authority supported it, before further commitment is made.